Girls For A Change
Girls For A Change is a national non-profit dedicated to empowering young women to create social change in their community.
logo
ZoomInfo
ubykotex:

Wow… so cool.

images from last weekend’s Girl Ambassador Summit in California!
ubykotex:

Wow… so cool.

images from last weekend’s Girl Ambassador Summit in California!
ubykotex:

Wow… so cool.

images from last weekend’s Girl Ambassador Summit in California!
ZoomInfo
Last week in response to VOCO’s extremely sexist and sexually objectifying  advertisements, MissRepresentation.org launched a new #NotBuyingIt campaign against the company. 
As displayed above, the ads used various female body parts and sexually suggestive language to promote their line of products. Need a refreseher in sexual objectification? Here you go!

The phrase “sexual objectification” has been around since the 1970s, but the phenomenon is more rampant than ever in popular culture–and we now know that it causes real harm.
What exactly is it, though? If objectification is the process of representing or treating a person like an object, then sexual objectification is the process of representing or treating a person like a sex object, one that serves another’s sexual pleasure.
How do we know sexual objectification when we see it? Building on the work of Nussbaum and Langton, I’ve devised the Sex Object Test (SOT) to measure the presence of sexual objectification in images. In it, I propose that sexual objectification is present if the answer to any of the following seven questions is “yes”:
1) Does the image show only part(s) of a sexualized person’s body?
Headless women, for example, make it easy to see them as only a body by erasing the individuality communicated through faces, eyes and eye contact.
2) Does the image present a sexualized person as a stand-in for an object?   
3) Does the image show sexualized persons as interchangeable?
Interchangeability is a common advertising theme that reinforces the idea that women, like objects, are fungible. And like objects, “more is better,” a market sentiment that erases the worth of individual women. 
see more here
(Caroline Heldman via MsMagazine.org)

Dozens of comments from MissRep and the organization’s Social Action Reps flooded the company’s Facebook page, which were promptly censored by VOCO. Eventually the company had to completely pull down their Facebook page due to the bombardment of incoming comments and messages from people protesting the objectifying nature of the ads. 
The page is now back up and running and MissRepresentation.org has informed us that they are in contact with Dirk Marketing, the agency behind the ad campaign. Hopefully we will see some real change as a result of this successful #NotBuyingIt campaign!
Read updates about the campaign here: #NotBuyigIt: VOCO
Last week in response to VOCO’s extremely sexist and sexually objectifying  advertisements, MissRepresentation.org launched a new #NotBuyingIt campaign against the company. 
As displayed above, the ads used various female body parts and sexually suggestive language to promote their line of products. Need a refreseher in sexual objectification? Here you go!

The phrase “sexual objectification” has been around since the 1970s, but the phenomenon is more rampant than ever in popular culture–and we now know that it causes real harm.
What exactly is it, though? If objectification is the process of representing or treating a person like an object, then sexual objectification is the process of representing or treating a person like a sex object, one that serves another’s sexual pleasure.
How do we know sexual objectification when we see it? Building on the work of Nussbaum and Langton, I’ve devised the Sex Object Test (SOT) to measure the presence of sexual objectification in images. In it, I propose that sexual objectification is present if the answer to any of the following seven questions is “yes”:
1) Does the image show only part(s) of a sexualized person’s body?
Headless women, for example, make it easy to see them as only a body by erasing the individuality communicated through faces, eyes and eye contact.
2) Does the image present a sexualized person as a stand-in for an object?   
3) Does the image show sexualized persons as interchangeable?
Interchangeability is a common advertising theme that reinforces the idea that women, like objects, are fungible. And like objects, “more is better,” a market sentiment that erases the worth of individual women. 
see more here
(Caroline Heldman via MsMagazine.org)

Dozens of comments from MissRep and the organization’s Social Action Reps flooded the company’s Facebook page, which were promptly censored by VOCO. Eventually the company had to completely pull down their Facebook page due to the bombardment of incoming comments and messages from people protesting the objectifying nature of the ads. 
The page is now back up and running and MissRepresentation.org has informed us that they are in contact with Dirk Marketing, the agency behind the ad campaign. Hopefully we will see some real change as a result of this successful #NotBuyingIt campaign!
Read updates about the campaign here: #NotBuyigIt: VOCO
Vote for MissRepresentation.org’s next social action campaign!